I have seen a number of re-evaluations of current disabilities for the stated purpose of reducing the S/C percentage. The view of the VARO has been that the symptoms of the claimed disability has gotten "better." The fact is that the medication the vet is using is effective. Latest example is a vet who is S/C 100% and the VA wants to reduce him to 40% because he is not having the gran-mal seizures he experienced prior to two years ago. The reason is that the VAMC has prescribed some very effective medications. If he stops taking the meds... the gan-mals start again. The primary care physician stated in the medical records that the vet not drive. The VARO respond with that being only the doctors "recommendation." So I ask: Are other Vets seeing this occure? and any suggestions on approaching the VARO's about this very short sighted and seemingly vindictive harasment. Thanks.